I’m a scientist who has gotten death threats. I fear what may happen under Trump.

Michael Mann, a professor of atmospheric science and director of the Earth System Science Center at Penn State, recently wrote an op-ed in the Washington Post. Here’s an excerpt:

“My Penn State colleagues looked with horror at the police tape across my office door.

Michael Mann

Michael Mann

“I had been opening mail at my desk that afternoon in August 2010 when a dusting of white powder fell from the folds of a letter. I dropped the letter, held my breath and slipped out the door as swiftly as I could, shutting it behind me. First I went to the bathroom to scrub my hands. Then I called the police.

“It turned out to be cornstarch, not anthrax. And it was just one in a long series of threats I’ve received since the late 1990s, when my research illustrated the unprecedented nature of global warming, producing an upward-trending temperature curve whose shape has been likened to a hockey stick.

“I’ve faced hostile investigations by politicians, demands for me to be fired from my job, threats against my life and even threats against my family. Those threats have diminished in recent years, as man-made climate change has become recognized as the overwhelming scientific consensus and as climate science has received the support of the federal government. But with the coming Trump administration, my colleagues and I are steeling ourselves for a renewed onslaught of intimidation, from inside and outside government. It would be bad for our work and bad for our planet.”

Read the full op-ed at WashingtonPost.com.

WorkZone: Your boss’s politics could affect how much you get paid

Forrest Briscoe, an associate professor of management and organization, and Aparna Joshi, Arnold Family Professor of Management, were recently quoted in an article about their research in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. Here’s an excerpt:

Forrest Briscoe

Forrest Briscoe

Aparna Joshi

Aparna Joshi

“Is your boss a liberal or conservative? If you’re a woman, you may want to find out.

“New research by two Penn State professors found that how much you get paid could depend on your boss’s political views.

“Professors Forrest Briscoe and Aparna Joshi of Penn State’s Smeal College of Business analyzed performance-based bonuses received by male and female attorneys over a six-year period at one of the nation’s largest law firms.

“Using campaign contributions as a guide, they found that for associates working for liberal partners in the firm, there was no gender gap in pay. But for those working under conservative partners, the males got bigger bonuses. The partners who supervised the associates were responsible for determining the size of bonuses.”

Read the full story at post-gazette.com.

The conflict of interest for President-elect Trump that no one’s talking about

Photo credit: m01229/ Flickr.com

Photo credit: m01229/ Flickr.com

Mark Feinberg, a clinical psychologist and health and human development research professor at Penn State, recently wrote an op-ed about the psychology of President-elect Donald Trump’s moral authority to be commander-in-chief for The Hill. Here’s an excerpt:

Mark Feinberg

Mark Feinberg

“President-elect Donald Trump and his family have exacerbated concerns about conflict of interest complications in the last two weeks. Although many papers and news broadcasts have discussed the multiple difficult problems that the Trump family’s financial empire poses for making presidential decisions in recent days, so far the focus has only been on half the issue.

“The president not only presides as chief executive of the federal government, he is also the commander in chief of the military and responsible for sending American soldiers into harm’s way.

“This presents an urgent problem.

“The moral authority of the president is critical in our democracy: The decisions of the commander in chief must be viewed as legitimate by the citizenry and especially those who serve in the military. When the moral authority of a president-commander declines, there can be serious negative consequences for our military and the security of our country.”

Read more at thehill.com.

Skip to toolbar