What does this election mean to America?

Image credit: newamericamedia.org

Image credit: newamericamedia.org

Christopher Beem, managing director of the McCourtney Institute for Democracy at Penn State; Dan Letwin, social history professor; and Rob Speel, associate professor of political science, were all recently quoted in a Sunbury Daily Item article about the presidential election. Here’s an excerpt:

“ ‘No matter where you come down politically, I don’t think anyone thinks this campaign has been a pleasant experience,’ said Christopher Beem, managing director, The McCourtney Institute of Democracy at Penn State University.

“Beem pointed to the start of it all, when Republican Sen. Ted Cruz announced in March 2015 that he was running for president. Ever since, this has been a rough-and-tumble, no-holds barred campaign characterized by sexual innuendo, half-truths, and charges of criminality that were magnified by social media and the 24-hour news cycle that now exists online and on cable TV.

“What does the last year say about America? ‘A lot of things,’ social historian Dan Letwin, a professor at Penn State University said.

“ ‘In most election years, win or lose, a good number of supporters of one candidate can accept the other candidate as a viable, legitimate president. Here, the vast majority of Trump supporters will not accept Hillary as a legitimate alternative, as the vast number of Clinton supporters will not accept Trump. Things are incredibly polarized,’ Letwin said.

“American politics has become almost tribal, noted Robert Speel, associate professor of politics at Penn State University. Supporters of both major party candidates often overlook the deep flaws of the candidate they support because the voters have such a deep-seated animosity towards the other party or candidate, Speel said.”

Read more at DailyItem.com.

Donald Trump and the psychology of bullying

Screenshot from a video of Donald Trump and Billy Bush that made national headlines during the presidential race.

Screenshot from a video of Donald Trump and Billy Bush that made national headlines during the presidential race.

Mark Feinberg, a clinical psychologist and health and human development research professor at Penn State, recently wrote an op-ed about the psychology of bullying in relation to some events during the 2016 presidential campaign. Here’s an excerpt:

“There are parallels here to the peer dynamics involved in bullying among kids. Researchers observe that there are more than just bullies and victims in schoolyard bullying situations. The bully often has lieutenants and supporters, and the presence of these kids creates enough fear to help silence and control the largest group of kids: the silent bystanders. One component of anti-bullying programs is sending the message to bystanders that silence enables more bullying, that they share in the responsibility if they don’t at least tell an adult.

Mark Feinberg

Mark Feinberg

“But how do bullies and their lieutenants form their loyal mutual-aggression pacts with each other? How do they know they can trust each other? After all, they surely don’t say, ‘If I go trip Bethany, will you guys to stand there and scare her friends into silence?’ Researchers have discovered that one important bonding mechanism is ‘deviant talk.’ Although a terrible label, deviant talk refers to the usually jovial and spirited discussions among kids that center on antisocial, anti-authority or aggressive themes. For the kids who engage in it, deviant talk is downright enjoyable—it usually involves a lot of laughter and fun. And this shared laughter and encouragement reinforces kids’ existing tendencies toward oppositional, delinquent or violent behavior. Research shows that deviant talk among friends or siblings predicts increased levels of antisocial and aggressive behavior from year to year.”

Read more at momentmag.com.

What will happen after the election? Pundits predict the future

Image credit: Penn State

Image credit: Penn State

Michael Berkman, political science professor and director of the Penn State McCourtney Institute for Democracy, was quoted recently in a CBS Pittsburgh Q&A article about the possible presidential election outcomes. Here’s an excerpt:

How do you think the American public will respond in the case of each candidate winning?

Michael Berkman

Michael Berkman

“Berkman: I think an interesting question is whether or not Trump will be shown the respect and deference usually shown a president (although in many cases not Obama). Given the tone of the campaign and his insulting comments I could imagine many simply not accepting him. If HRC wins a significant portion of Trump’s supporters may well see her as illegitimate because they have been told repeatedly the election is rigged. …

“What do you foresee being the political climate of 2017? As cold as this year or finally warming up?

“Berkman: The American public is angry and lacking hope. The Congress is advertising an unwillingness to work with the Democratic nominee. So if HRC wins, it won’t be pleasant. If Trump wins and has a united Congress I think we’ll see the most conservative policies ever, developed by the Congress and approved by a largely hands-off president. Of greatest concern is how far Trump goes on his more authoritarian instincts: restrictions on the press, harsh deportation, torturing suspects, cracking down on protests, etc.”

Read more at pittsburgh.cbslocal.com.

Skip to toolbar